Strategy Vaults include a governance system that lets managers propose changes and vault depositors/LP holders vote (optional) on them. Policy changes on a live vault (AUM > 0) must go through this proposal flow usingDocumentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://v2-docs.exponent.finance/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
PolicyAction — direct wrapper policy calls are restricted to vaults with zero AUM.
Governance settings such as voting period, timelock, and rejection threshold can be updated through the vault’s governance and settings flow.
Proposal Lifecycle
-
Propose — manager creates a proposal with a
ProposalAction(settings change or position update) -
Vote — LP holders stake LP tokens to vote
RejectorOptOutduring the voting periodManagers can disable vault depositor rejection voting by setting the voting period to 0 hours. In that configuration, proposals skip the voting step and proceed directly to the timelock phase, and depositors can no longer veto or block vault parameter changes. - Finalize — after the voting period ends, anyone can finalize to determine pass/reject
- Timelock — if approved, the proposal enters a timelock period before execution
- Execute — after the timelock passes, anyone can execute the approved proposal
Sentinel operations (emergency pause/freeze) are currently managed by the Exponent core team.
Voting
Strategy Vault voting is rejection-based. Proposals pass by default unless depositors (vault LP holders) reject them with enough shares during the voting period to reach the rejection threshold. Vault depositors can vote in two ways:Reject— counts toward rejecting the proposalOptOut— counts toward rejecting the proposal and triggers a withdrawal queue for user funds if the proposal passes
If a vault depositor voted
OptOut and the proposal passed, their position is automatically queued for withdrawal instead of being returned. If the proposal fails, their position remains unchanged in the vault.This feature allows depositors to protect themselves against sudden changes to the vault’s mandate.Voting Parameters
The voting model is configured at the vault level through governance parameters such as:voting_enableddefault_voting_period_secondsmin_voting_period_secondsmax_voting_period_secondsdefault_timelock_secondsrejection_threshold_bps
Voting Period vs. Timelock
Voting and timelock are separate phases.- The voting period is the time within which vault depositors can react to a proposal
- The timelock starts only after voting has ended and the proposal has been finalized as approved
- voting period = 2 days
- timelock = 3 days
Rejection Threshold
Proposal rejection is controlled byrejection_threshold_bps.
By default, this is set to 33%, meaning vault depositors must stake enough LP in Reject to cross that threshold during the voting period for the proposal to fail.
Managers can disable vault depositor rejection voting by setting the voting period to 0 hours. In that configuration, proposals skip the voting step and proceed directly to the timelock phase, and depositors can no longer veto or block vault parameter changes.
Instructions
Propose Action
Create a governance proposal for settings or position changes.
Voting
Stake LP tokens to vote on proposals. Unstake after voting ends.
Execute Proposal
Finalize and execute approved proposals.